Methodology
Version 1.0.0, updated 2026-07-03. Every score on this site can be recomputed from the published data and the rules on this page. The scoring engine and data are open; each clinic page lists its sources and check dates.
About the Data
All data is independently collected from public sources and may contain errors — report a correction. This rating is not medical advice, and ranking positions are not for sale.
What We Measure — and What We Don't
We score publicly verifiable factors: how transparent a clinic is about its team, services, and prices; what public review signals look like; which infrastructure and services are documented; how reachable the clinic is for English-speaking patients; and how visible it is in search and AI assistants.
We do not measure clinical quality. This index is not a medical recommendation, and a high score does not mean a clinic is "the best" or that treatment there is right for you. Always consult a qualified professional about medical decisions.
The Formula
Each clinic is scored in six categories. Within a category, criteria have fixed point values (tables below). A clinic's score in any rating profile is:
profile score = 100 × Σ(category% × weight) / Σ(weights) + red-flag penalty clamped to 0…100, where category% = earned points / category maximum
Category weights are relative; scores are normalized to a 100-point scale. The default "Overall Transparency & Trust" profile uses the methodology's own category maxima (Information Transparency 20, Price Transparency 15, Reputation & Reviews 20, Medical Infrastructure 15, Communication & Service 10, AI & Search Visibility 10) as weights.
Unknown data scores 0 points. When we cannot verify a fact, the clinic earns no points for it, and the item is listed on the clinic's page under "Data we could not verify" — explicitly not as a negative finding. Absence of evidence never earns points, and never triggers a red flag by itself.
Information Transparency — up to 20 points
Whether basic facts about the clinic - its team, premises, services, and location - are publicly verifiable.
| Criterion | Points | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| Has a working website | 4 | The clinic operates an official website that loads and contains current information. |
| Dentist names listed | 3 | Patients can see who will treat them: the names of practicing dentists are published. |
| Dentist specializations listed | 2 | Qualifications or specializations (e.g. prosthodontics, oral surgery) are stated for the listed dentists. |
| Real clinic photos | 2 | The website or listings show genuine photos of the premises rather than only stock imagery. |
| Service list published | 3 | A concrete list of offered treatments is published. |
| Clear contact details | 2 | Phone, email, or messenger contacts are easy to find and consistent across sources. |
| English website version | 2 | The website is available in English (relevant for Pattaya's international patients). |
| Address and map published | 2 | A verifiable street address and map location are published. |
Price Transparency — up to 15 points
Whether patients can estimate costs before visiting. Published price ranges count; exact prices are not required.
| Criterion | Points | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| Prices or price ranges published | 3 | A general price list or price ranges are publicly available. |
| Cleaning price listed | 2 | The price (or range) for dental cleaning / scaling is published. |
| Filling price listed | 2 | The price (or range) for fillings is published. |
| Crown price listed | 2 | The price (or range) for crowns is published. |
| Implant price listed | 2 | The price (or range) for dental implants is published. |
| Consultation price listed | 2 | The price of an initial consultation (or that it is free) is published. |
| X-ray / imaging price listed | 2 | The price for X-ray or other imaging is published. |
Reputation & Reviews — up to 20 points
Public review signals. The Google rating is adjusted with a Bayesian prior (rating 4.0, weight 25) so a 5.0 from a handful of reviews does not outrank a 4.8 from hundreds.
| Criterion | Points | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) | 6 | Average Google Maps rating, adjusted for review volume before mapping to points. (threshold table below) |
| Google review volume | 3 | Number of public Google reviews. (threshold table below) |
| Review recency | 3 | How recent the latest public reviews are. (within 3 months: 3 · within year: 1.5 · older: 0 · unknown: 0) |
| Clinic responds to reviews | 2 | The clinic visibly answers public reviews, including critical ones. |
| No recurring complaints | 2 | Points are earned when public reviews show no repeated pattern of the same complaint. A verified pattern of complaints earns 0 here and may also trigger a red flag. |
| No suspicious review patterns | 2 | Points are earned when review history shows no signs of manipulation (bursts of 5-star reviews, template wording, reviewer accounts with a single review). |
| Active Facebook presence | 1 | The clinic has an identifiable Facebook page with activity or reviews. |
| TripAdvisor presence | 0.5 | The clinic is reviewed on TripAdvisor. |
| Other review platforms | 0.5 | The clinic is reviewed on other platforms (WhatClinic, Dental Departures, etc.). |
Medical Infrastructure — up to 15 points
The range of publicly documented equipment and services. This measures documented availability, not clinical quality.
| Criterion | Points | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| On-site X-ray | 2 | Dental X-ray equipment is documented. |
| CBCT (3D imaging) | 2 | Cone-beam CT is documented (relevant for implant planning). |
| Implantology | 2 | Dental implant treatment is offered. |
| Orthodontics | 2 | Braces / aligner treatment is offered. |
| Oral surgery | 2 | Surgical procedures (extractions, wisdom teeth, etc.) are offered. |
| Pediatric dentistry | 1.5 | Children's dentistry is offered. |
| Emergency care | 1.5 | Emergency or same-day appointments are documented. |
| Works with international patients | 2 | The clinic documents experience with foreign patients (international insurance, English paperwork, etc.). |
Communication & Service — up to 10 points
How easy it is to contact the clinic, get answers, and book - especially for non-Thai speakers.
| Criterion | Points | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| WhatsApp / LINE available | 2 | The clinic can be reached via WhatsApp or LINE. |
| Response speed | 1.5 | How quickly the clinic answers inquiries, where data is available. (fast: 1.5 · moderate: 0.75 · slow: 0 · unknown: 0) |
| English spoken | 2.5 | Staff communicate in English, per the clinic's own materials or consistent review evidence. |
| Pre-visit consultation possible | 1.5 | A preliminary consultation or online inquiry with a treatment estimate is possible. |
| Clear service explanations | 1 | Services are explained in plain language (what the procedure is, what it involves). |
| Convenient opening hours | 1.5 | Open evenings and/or weekends, published clearly. |
AI & Search Visibility — up to 10 points
Whether the clinic is discoverable when patients search - including via AI assistants. Checked with fixed queries: "best dentist Pattaya", "English speaking dentist Pattaya", "dental implants Pattaya", "emergency dentist Pattaya", "Pattaya dental clinic for expats".
| Criterion | Points | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| Mentioned for: best dentist Pattaya | 1 | The clinic appears in AI assistant / top search answers for this query. |
| Mentioned for: English speaking dentist Pattaya | 1 | The clinic appears in AI assistant / top search answers for this query. |
| Mentioned for: dental implants Pattaya | 1 | The clinic appears in AI assistant / top search answers for this query. |
| Mentioned for: emergency dentist Pattaya | 1 | The clinic appears in AI assistant / top search answers for this query. |
| Mentioned for: Pattaya dental clinic for expats | 1 | The clinic appears in AI assistant / top search answers for this query. |
| Structured data on website | 1.5 | The website uses structured data (schema.org LocalBusiness/Dentist markup or equivalent). |
| Google indexing quality | 2 | Whether the clinic's own pages rank for its name and core services. (good: 2 · partial: 1 · poor: 0 · unknown: 0) |
| Dedicated service pages | 1.5 | Individual pages exist for key services (implants, orthodontics, etc.) rather than one generic list. |
Review Score Adjustment
Raw star ratings are misleading at low review counts, so the Google rating is adjusted with a Bayesian prior of 4 stars weighted as 25 reviews before mapping to points:
adjusted = (rating × reviews + 4 × 25) / (reviews + 25)
Adjusted rating → points
| Adjusted rating | Points |
|---|---|
| ≥ 4.7 | 6 |
| ≥ 4.5 | 5 |
| ≥ 4.3 | 4 |
| ≥ 4 | 3 |
| ≥ 3.5 | 1 |
| ≥ 0 | 0 |
Review count → points
| Reviews | Points |
|---|---|
| ≥ 500 | 3 |
| ≥ 200 | 2.5 |
| ≥ 100 | 2 |
| ≥ 50 | 1.5 |
| ≥ 20 | 1 |
| ≥ 5 | 0.5 |
| ≥ 0 | 0 |
Example: a 5.0 rating from 3 reviews adjusts to 4.11, while a 4.8 from 500 reviews adjusts to 4.76 — volume matters.
Red Flags (Penalties)
Documented problems subtract points. Each flag has a severity set by the evidence; the total penalty is capped at -20 points. Flags require public evidence (cited on the clinic page) — we never apply a flag on suspicion alone. Some flags are auto-derived from verified negatives (e.g. "no prices published" → opaque pricing, low severity).
| Flag | Low | Medium | High | What triggers it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complaints about upselling / pushed treatment | -2 | -4 | -7 | Multiple independent public reviews describe pressure to accept treatment beyond what was requested. |
| Opaque or bait pricing | -2 | -4 | -6 | Public complaints about final bills materially exceeding quoted prices, or advertised prices that are not honored. |
| No dentists identified anywhere | -2 | -3 | -5 | No practicing dentist can be identified from any public source. |
| Suspicious review patterns | -3 | -5 | -8 | Review history shows signs of manipulation. |
| No verifiable address | -3 | -5 | -8 | No consistent physical address can be verified. |
| Aggressive marketing practices | -1 | -3 | -5 | Spam, fake urgency, unverifiable superlative claims, or paid placement disguised as reviews. |
| Contradictory public information | -1 | -3 | -5 | Key facts (address, hours, dentists, prices) contradict each other across the clinic's own public sources. |
| Recurring communication complaints | -1 | -3 | -5 | Repeated public complaints about unanswered messages, language barriers, or broken appointments. |
Rating Profiles
All profiles use the same underlying data — only the category weights, penalty multiplier, and eligibility rules differ. A clinic is excluded from a profile (shown as "not ranked") when the qualifying service is verifiably absent, or when we could not verify the data the profile depends on.
| Profile | Information Transparency | Price Transparency | Reputation & Reviews | Medical Infrastructure | Communication & Service | AI & Search Visibility | Penalty | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Transparency & Trust | 20 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 10 | ×1 | All clinics |
| Best for Expats | 15 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 10 | ×1 | Excluded if verified absent: Works with international patients |
| Best for Dental Implants | 10 | 20 | 20 | 30 | 10 | 10 | ×1 | Requires verified: Implantology |
| Best for Emergency Dental Care | 10 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 25 | 5 | ×1 | Requires verified: Emergency care |
| Best Price Transparency | 20 | 45 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 5 | ×1.2 | All clinics |
| Best English-speaking Clinics | 20 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 10 | ×1 | Requires verified: English spoken |
| Best for Families / Children | 15 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 5 | ×1 | Requires verified: Pediatric dentistry |
Independence Rules
- This rating is not a medical recommendation. It measures transparency and public signals, not treatment quality or outcomes.
- Ranking positions are not for sale. No clinic can pay to raise its score or position, directly or indirectly.
- Paid audits do not affect positions. We offer clinics an improvement audit; purchasing one (or declining one) has zero effect on scoring. Scores change only when the underlying public data changes.
- The rating updates when data changes. Re-checks, corrections, and methodology updates are logged in the changelog and in each clinic's change history.
- Errors are fixable by anyone. Every clinic page links to a correction form; verified corrections are applied with a public history entry.
Note on AI-visibility checks: quoted queries such as "best dentist Pattaya" are the fixed search phrases we test — they are patients' words, not our claims about any clinic.